KAZ

my way of writing the 123 is different from others...but it still means the same thing

yes sorry guys,
just my numbering is confusing. I was trying to adopt remo's system (see learn to trade section for diagram of 123 low) where the high of the move is assigned 1. Then subsequent low of move 2, but I was then using 3 as target label. Target is same though ~ 284 ')
lets hope it gets there

ps I blame everything on remo

Seems to be significant resistance in 260-263 level, it will be tough to break through this resistance.

I like to be different and awkward

This looks like it could break out of the 123 Low formation.
Right on resistance now at 2.63

uk.advfn.com/p.php?pid=chartscreenshotsh...pZmI%3D&symbol=L^KAZ

Yes TF,
Through to 263.4/5 now, being driven almost entirely by AT's. I'm tempted to for a small punt on this now but I'm always a bit suspicious of AT driven rises. Just going to watch it a little bit longer before diving in.