- Posts: 3158
- Thank you received: 0
GKP
12 years 10 months ago - 12 years 10 months ago #5860
by remo
This is a chart of SLE, This is what GKP traders should look for to give a green light for safer entry. you can see the 123 low quite clearly on this chart and this came after a long down trend.
GKP is in a down trend currently and any longs are just a gamble as there are no buy signals.
so look at the chart below to see what you need to look out for to give a green light.
Even with the green light you should have stops attached.
I repeat...THIS IS NOT A CHART OF GKP ...I know there are a few crazy people out there that might think this chart is GKP

GKP is in a down trend currently and any longs are just a gamble as there are no buy signals.
so look at the chart below to see what you need to look out for to give a green light.
Even with the green light you should have stops attached.
I repeat...THIS IS NOT A CHART OF GKP ...I know there are a few crazy people out there that might think this chart is GKP
Last edit: 12 years 10 months ago by remo.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
12 years 10 months ago #5879
by Jackozy
Could it be that this is about to form wave 4 of C? It hit the trendline support from the 64p and 87p lows yesterday and if it closes around 135/6 would form a hammer off this support on the weekly chart:
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20815047/GKPweekly09_05_13.gif
I still think it would need to make a lower low even if it does bounce here so I'll not be doing anything just yet. Well, except for watching and waiting that is!
PS This is the slight drawback with a 123-low approach; in a downtrend waves b of A, wave B itself and waves 2 and 4 of C should all give 123-low breakout buy signals but are only corrections in the downtrend. That doesn't mean don't take them, but it does mean bank profit or move your stops to B/E.
Examples of this on the above chart were:
The breakout above 243p gave a 123-low to go long in Sept 2012 during wave B up;
The breakout above 187p gave a 123-low to go long in Jan 2013 during wave 2 of C up.
Don't get me wrong, 123-lows are great trade strategies, but they don't always give rise to long term uptrends.
dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/20815047/GKPweekly09_05_13.gif
I still think it would need to make a lower low even if it does bounce here so I'll not be doing anything just yet. Well, except for watching and waiting that is!
PS This is the slight drawback with a 123-low approach; in a downtrend waves b of A, wave B itself and waves 2 and 4 of C should all give 123-low breakout buy signals but are only corrections in the downtrend. That doesn't mean don't take them, but it does mean bank profit or move your stops to B/E.
Examples of this on the above chart were:
The breakout above 243p gave a 123-low to go long in Sept 2012 during wave B up;
The breakout above 187p gave a 123-low to go long in Jan 2013 during wave 2 of C up.
Don't get me wrong, 123-lows are great trade strategies, but they don't always give rise to long term uptrends.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ronnie, remo, WaveSurfer, annes goal, Basementgeek, Greville, Amo, Syrian Empire
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 634
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 10 months ago #5880
by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
I've labelled a tentative 3 at yesterday's low....
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jackozy
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
12 years 10 months ago #5882
by Jackozy
Me too. There was a hammer on the 4H and it's gapped up off that today.
161p still the number on this.
161p still the number on this.
The following user(s) said Thank You: WaveSurfer
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 634
- Thank you received: 0
12 years 10 months ago - 12 years 10 months ago #5885
by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
yep
also
w1 of c =~258 - ~161 = 97p
w3 of c = 228 - 126 = 102p
also
w1 of c =~258 - ~161 = 97p
w3 of c = 228 - 126 = 102p
Last edit: 12 years 10 months ago by WaveSurfer.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jackozy
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
12 years 10 months ago #5893
by Jackozy
Yup, that's enough to guarantee wave 3 not the shortest.
161 - 87 = 74 = 97 x 0.764 (give or take a 1/1000th)
161 - 104 = 57 = 97 x 0.588
Interesting...
161 - 87 = 74 = 97 x 0.764 (give or take a 1/1000th)
161 - 104 = 57 = 97 x 0.588
Interesting...
The following user(s) said Thank You: WaveSurfer
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.307 seconds
