- Posts: 42
- Thank you received: 0
GKP
11 years 8 months ago #10732
by psyurmh
Thanks Remo.
How tight should the stops be? I was thinking 69.5p, but wondered if there was an indicator that would be useful.
Thanks
How tight should the stops be? I was thinking 69.5p, but wondered if there was an indicator that would be useful.
Thanks
The following user(s) said Thank You: ronnie
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 8 months ago #10733
by remo
yep that should be fine...Normally you would place stops below the nearest supports from your entry..In this case its roughly 65 but that would mean a bigger stop so your level should be ok as a first attempt should not really go too low
The following user(s) said Thank You: WaveSurfer
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 7 months ago #10742
by orsotoro
Hi Remo,
Why would you not view the mid 60s ( 67 on the weekly ) as a significant support level ( the 2010 low ) ?
Why would you not view the mid 60s ( 67 on the weekly ) as a significant support level ( the 2010 low ) ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
11 years 7 months ago #10743
by remo
Hi orsotoro
Yep it is a very significant area. 64 is very strong support.
The reason i have not mentioned that level is ,im talking about a very short term trade based on a possible double bottom and that comes in at 72. So having the stop below 64 would mean a huge risk to reward .Even thou that would be the ideal area to have the stop at. So if 72 fails as a trade then the next best level to go long is at 64.If that level breaks then GKP will be in big trouble.
I should have mentioned 64 but im glad there are people like you that will correct me.

Yep it is a very significant area. 64 is very strong support.
The reason i have not mentioned that level is ,im talking about a very short term trade based on a possible double bottom and that comes in at 72. So having the stop below 64 would mean a huge risk to reward .Even thou that would be the ideal area to have the stop at. So if 72 fails as a trade then the next best level to go long is at 64.If that level breaks then GKP will be in big trouble.
I should have mentioned 64 but im glad there are people like you that will correct me.
orsotoro wrote: Hi Remo,
Why would you not view the mid 60s ( 67 on the weekly ) as a significant support level ( the 2010 low ) ?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 519
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 7 months ago #10745
by Food4Thought
Replied by Food4Thought on topic GKP
This should be it. Third test on 78.25. Let's see.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 519
- Thank you received: 0
11 years 7 months ago #10746
by Food4Thought
Replied by Food4Thought on topic GKP
Well, after a lot of dithering we finally reach the next crossroads. RSI support broke yesterday as did 78.25 support. One might expect this level to form as resistance should it close at/below this level.
I inserted a new trendline which gives an interim support at 76 before 72.25 and 64.
uk.advfn.com/p.php?pid=chartscreenshotsh...v0%3D&symbol=L%5EGKP
Volume is key and will tell us how low it will go.
F4T
Ps: Fun and games over at AFR.
I inserted a new trendline which gives an interim support at 76 before 72.25 and 64.
uk.advfn.com/p.php?pid=chartscreenshotsh...v0%3D&symbol=L%5EGKP
Volume is key and will tell us how low it will go.
F4T
Ps: Fun and games over at AFR.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.228 seconds
