GKP

Thanks for that F4T

..and thank you for taking time to post your thoughts over the Christmas period. I wasn't gonna post myself but as you made the effort..... I thought I'd have a little look from a different perspective.

What I do notice is a symmetrical triangle on the chart - my chart's a bit slap dash, but it's identified by black dashed lines (yup - slap dash! ha, ha!) I've copied each converging line and plopped them roughly to make parallel channels to roughly see upside/downside targets and they do tie in with the fibs somewhat. The thing is, it's tough to call direction as it's slap bang in the middle of range for me at the moment. Also it's not the most reliable pattern until it breaks either way. Though if it does break to the downside, it's usually decisive, so the 50p and a co-ordinated RNS (LOL - very true) would be the important downside area for a bounce, and also there is more room to move upwards to the 76p area without a breakout.





From an Elliot wave perspective - as long as it doesn't breach the 42.25p low this can still be the wave 2 pullback, if it does.....'twas all just a correction to prevailing downtrend.
However a bounce above 48.5p if it has peaked, may identify a minor i and ii wave before iii of the 3 if that makes sense?!

I can't see a lower low though, as I reckon oil is around it's lows now and it's correction should be up taking the sector up for a ride.(hopefully!) But this is GKP, so never say never, just watch those targets I'd say. What the hell 76p first, then a pullback! Ha, ha, Happy to be wrong

Here's a bit of info on symmetrical triangles for anyone not familiar.
stockcharts.com/school/doku.php?id=chart...riangle_continuation

Happy new year all. Back in the New Year.

Ive not changed any setting on my software???
It must be your browser or your end as every thing still looks the same on my computers.
Happy New year

diver993 wrote: KK,

The chart sizes question: Remo appears to have changed something in his software and charts now show to the bottom right-hand corner, which I personally think is useless, so the external link is the only way to see them properly

Remo,

My apologies re: changing the software - I was logged on with I.E. instead of my usual Chrome, hence the difference. I.E is weird! For any of you guys posting charts, don't use I.E. as it will force the links to the bottom right-hand corner of your browser and not expand them as you would like.
Happy New Year Chartsview!

Was just wondering F4T if the strong downtrend line you have in blue is broken by going above to 70 or more on reasonably strong move would that mean the downtrend is then broken? And a new trend forming?
And can I also ask if your doubts about it going above high 80's ( to which I listen with great attention) are chart based or based on what you mentioned about fundamental values.
I do find it interesting the relation or non relation with fundamental values as I believe most chartists discount them entirely.

For real strength to come back to GKP this has to break above 85p. This is the most important level currently as the 123 low breakout point and the 200EMA is at the same spot. 2 levels of resistances together so strong resistance. A break above this level should be powerful and signal a change in trend.
Early entry could be a break above 71 but with tight stops as this area is roughly where the main down trend line is(69), well below this but best to go above the strong resistance for entry.



dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4899609/gkp6thjan2015.png

Resistance..69.75(trendline),,,,71,,,85(200ema and 123 low)
support....50.5(trendline),,,,48.5,,42.5(very strong support)

Hi SE,
you can have a penetration of trendlines intra day but the close is the most important point, so a rise above it to 70 is not a break. Also, a close above can also fail.

I gave a high of 83 on the move up from 42 and my view has not changed. It made 85 so it was a good call. Above that 89.50 is strong resistance, so we now have both 85 and 89.50 as resistance within a few ticks so a break through will need a lot of strength. Where will that come from?

You have to always have an eye on fundamentals whatever the charts say. If you trade long or invest, there has to be fundamental value in the stock or people won;t buy it. If you trade short there needs to be an inherent weakness in the stock to support that stance.

I have said it before and will so again; Firstly, the CPR (at $100+ oil) gave an asset value of 68p. Forget all the bn's OIP BS that went before. It is irrelevant to analysts and the city. Until the reserve report changes then that is the benchmark for the stock no matter how much they produce. Oil is now heading for $40, so the DCF value will be less on a lower forward oil curve.
Also, GKP has a high finding cost and (i think) a high opex/bbl number, so what is their b/e? This is what the analysts will be looking for when the annual report comes out. The RNS re: power/fuel was all about making the market believe that their costs are low. I don;t believe it. Heavy oil, sulpur, trucking costs, security, above average salaries. It all points to high opex.
If opex/bbl is lower than anticipated, expect a rise but not above the resistances in the 80's. If opex/bbl is high IMO this will crash as oil is set to stay low at least until the summer.

The annual report will be interesting and a challenge for the auditors given the management of this company.

Remember, 57 is the 61.8% fib and this was tested today. After that 48.50 is crucial. We have had three lower highs and three lower lows since 85. This is a short term downtrend in addition to the long term one.

My advice is wait for the annual report and react to that.

GL
F4T

Slow Eddie wrote: Was just wondering F4T if the strong downtrend line you have in blue is broken by going above to 70 or more on reasonably strong move would that mean the downtrend is then broken? And a new trend forming?
And can I also ask if your doubts about it going above high 80's ( to which I listen with great attention) are chart based or based on what you mentioned about fundamental values.
I do find it interesting the relation or non relation with fundamental values as I believe most chartists discount them entirely.