- Posts: 898
- Thank you received: 0
GKP
13 years 1 month ago #4221
by Jackozy
Hi Diver,
I've just been looking again at your wave count posted earlier and I notice that the link has a different count from the chart. Which one are you running with at the moment please?
I've just been looking again at your wave count posted earlier and I notice that the link has a different count from the chart. Which one are you running with at the moment please?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 month ago #4229
by diver993
Sorry Jackozy, the correct chart is the link; think I'm gonna give up trying to post the 'pretty picture' version as it always appears to pick up an older version of the same chart?? Not only that but it never expands sufficiently to make it viable.
Diver
Diver
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jackozy
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 month ago #4230
by diver993
Ok Jacko, in true ladylike manner, I've changed my mind again. I've had a bit of time this afternoon and spent a fair proportion looking at this chart.
My conclusion is as follows.....
screencast.com/t/o2DjT4EW
So as to avoid any mishaps and confusion I'm only posting this link.... from ( B ) we go skyward to those fluffy clouds of which dreams are made ....... I, and thousands of other PI's, hope
. If you really want me to ramp it up I go for £8
My conclusion is as follows.....
screencast.com/t/o2DjT4EW
So as to avoid any mishaps and confusion I'm only posting this link.... from ( B ) we go skyward to those fluffy clouds of which dreams are made ....... I, and thousands of other PI's, hope
The following user(s) said Thank You: Jackozy
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
13 years 1 month ago #4238
by Jackozy
Lol!
Diver, I don't want you to either ramp it or de-ramp it mate. I just want your analysis
It won't surprise you to learn that, at first glance, I've got some issues with your count on your latest link. If you've got wave A down to 141p, B up to 260p then your wave C down from there needs to be a motive wave (ie a 5) rather than the corrective form you're counting.
I'll have a further think about it and get back to you tomorrow. You've got some complicated corrective patterns going on and they're never easy to interpret!
Diver, I don't want you to either ramp it or de-ramp it mate. I just want your analysis
It won't surprise you to learn that, at first glance, I've got some issues with your count on your latest link. If you've got wave A down to 141p, B up to 260p then your wave C down from there needs to be a motive wave (ie a 5) rather than the corrective form you're counting.
I'll have a further think about it and get back to you tomorrow. You've got some complicated corrective patterns going on and they're never easy to interpret!
The following user(s) said Thank You: diver993
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 634
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 1 month ago #4239
by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
guys looks like GKP is putting in a few nested 1-2's and from where i'm looking this could indicate a big move north is due, possibly the wave that every man and his dog wants to get in on. what wave could that be then ?
dont meant mean it cant get to 196/187, it'll still remain bull. however close below 198 consecutively - i'd start look at alternatives.
dont meant mean it cant get to 196/187, it'll still remain bull. however close below 198 consecutively - i'd start look at alternatives.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.206 seconds
