ChartsView - Stock Trading Community

GKP

More
12 years 11 months ago #5564 by Jackozy
Replied by Jackozy on topic GKP
Evening Bonobo,

I said I'd get back to you later but I've not had a lot of time so I'm winging it a bit here.

Firstly, I think it's dangerous to assume that today's low was THE low. There is plenty of support here but dojis can appear half way through a move as well as at turning points. In addition there's the following (very bearish) possibility:

Big bad bear option:

The move from 450 (465) to 141 was wave A down with B up to 260. C then should be a 5 wave move. This would give 1 of C down to 161, 2 up to 228 and we're in 3 now with a target (for wave 3 of C) at 68p. That would then be followed by a wave 4 of C up and a wave 5 of C down below 68p.

Now, before we all get hot under the collar, this is pure theory and, perhaps more importantly, corrective waves (an ABC sequence) are notoriously complex and unpredictable so I wouldn't hold much sway on those numbers. It does keep the 87p in play though. The rapid drop of the last few days kind of adds weight to this as the 3rd wave ought to be the longest and strongest and that's what we've seen. Add to that today's doji (which can appear mid range) and, well, you get the picture.

Optimistic big bull option:

IF today's low was THE low, then the whole wave structure from 4.5p days most likely (at the moment) means that 87p to 450p was wave 1 of 3 up (this major wave's version of 4.5p to 21p) and the drop from 450p to wherever it goes to is the wave 2 of 3.

You might think this unlikely given the sizes of the moves, but on log scale this makes perfect sense. Compare, for example, the %age change in price between the 4.5p to 21p move and that of the 87p to 450p move. Similar, no?

What's worrying about this option is that we're way below the 61% Fib we might expect for a wave 2. If correct, though, the projection of 87 to 450 from 131 comes in at 718p. Hmmmm....

The upshot is that it's really difficult to say until a bottom has been confirmed. The best confirmation we can get (nothing is 100%) is a higher low followed by a higher high. Only then can we really start to discuss upside targets with anything like authority.

One final note, if we look at the weekly chart (don't look at the P&F one if you want to keep your heart rate down!) then we could really, badly, do with a close above 161p tomorrow. That would set up a lovely weekly candle and leave us with having held onto 161p support on the weekly chart.

The only sensible way to play this is per remo's suggestion: wait for a higher low (should be at the 61 fib) and then go long on the breakout. Anything else has a large dose of gambling involved.

All the best in every way!

J.
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo, Monkeyz, diver993, CT79, Greville, Trendfriend, not-just-anytradr, bonobo77

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 11 months ago #5566 by ronnie
Replied by ronnie on topic GKP
F4T, this site is a peaceful site where everyone’s is entitled to their opinion; please keep your comments above board. Everyone has their own ways of trading and this needs to be respected. We won’t tolerate any confrontational behaviour; please tone it down otherwise warnings will be give out, if it carries on like this.
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo, diver993, Tejassi, bonobo77

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 11 months ago #5569 by Trendfriend
Replied by Trendfriend on topic GKP
Jackozy,

Just noticed something on the long term GKP chart.

I see a gap(i've tried to show it with the horizontal lines). Sorry about the dodgy chart, but the gap is around 55p roughly.

My question is this, if we take your Big bad Bear option(LOL), its not a million miles from this gap, right?

Not saying we are going there, but say a bad result in the court case, then possibly.
Just wondered if you had noticed this gap before?
Here is the link
uk.advfn.com/p.php?pid=chartscreenshotsh...bd80=&symbol=L%5EGKP

B.Regs,
Trendfriend.
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 11 months ago #5570 by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
J pretty much agree with your assessment, imo i dont think the low is in...too many PI eyes on the 140/131 price range along with a somewhat muted reaction in price and candle... one potential positive to take is there appears to be a +div developing daily & weekly from previous lows of 139p jun2012, maybe just maybe...confirmation is key now before entering into this.

if ~126/119 goes.. then u bet this will trigger a waterfull effect & a very good possibility it'll start ripping through into 106 > 88 > 68 > 54p.

WS.
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo, Jackozy, Trendfriend

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 11 months ago #5572 by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
here's a simple chart but effective chart and it dont look pretty, needs to start moving to the upside pretty quickly: :ohmy: :dry: :sick:

dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/40497882/GKP_Monthly.JPG

WaveSurfer wrote: J pretty much agree with your assessment, imo i dont think the low is in...too many PI eyes on the 140/131 price range along with a somewhat muted reaction in price and candle... one potential positive to take is there appears to be a +div developing daily & weekly from previous lows of 139p jun2012, maybe just maybe...confirmation is key now before entering into this.

if ~126/119 goes.. then u bet this will trigger a waterfull effect & a very good possibility it'll start ripping through into 106 > 88 > 68 > 54p.

WS.

The following user(s) said Thank You: remo, Shotry, Jackozy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
12 years 11 months ago #5579 by WaveSurfer
Replied by WaveSurfer on topic GKP
seeing there's lots of interest - here's a different view...

dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/40497882/GKP_Lifecyclev2.JPG
The following user(s) said Thank You: remo, Monkeyz, Jackozy, on greenhill, cautious tone

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: remo
Time to create page: 0.220 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum